Showing posts with label Cairns Regional Council. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cairns Regional Council. Show all posts

Friday, 20 April 2012

Cr Alan Blake did vote for the Precinct, even though he says he didn't

I was going to write a heap of stuff here about the duplicitous re-election campaign that Cairns Regional Councillor Alan Blake is running, but I thought it would be easier to let the pictures do the talking.

Here's the Councillor's car snapped by a CairnsBlog reader yesterday...

He proudly claims "I didn't vote for the Entertainment Precinct.  I't's too expensive and on the wrong site."





But wait, take a look at this.   Here's the Councillor's voting record on the Cairns Entertainment Precinct.

Alan Blake moved the original motion, with the support of Deputy Mayor Cochrane who is now loudly opposing it as well.  In 2010 Blake moved another motion with specific reference to the waterfront site being "ideal and does not impede future Port development."



In this week's CairnsSun newspaper, Cr Blake says "I strongly opposed this new theatre plan and have lobbied for a more affordable option on a site that won't stifle vital port activity."

Isn't this just a little bit bullshit?

Tuesday, 27 July 2010

Your community needs your view


Cairns Regional Council needs your help to plan for tomorrow.

"We need to know your dreams, your hopes, your vision on how our region will unfold over the next 20 years and beyond," CEO Lyn Russell says. "This is your community and your voice needs to be one of those calling directions for the path we take into the future."

"Right now, our community is poised to take its place as one of the great tropical cities in Australia – and the world," Lyn Russell says. "Cairns Regional Council is entering a crucial stage of planning with the community to ensure we provide a plan that truly reflects a united way forward. Council wants to hear about how you view future opportunities that need to be pursued for you, your children and your grandchildren. We also want your views on how you’d like to see Council shape its future role to take full advantage of our resources, expertise and knowledge for the region."

Russell says this means working in new ways to make sure they hear opinions and engage in consultation in the most effective ways possible.

"We will be asking for participation from all stakeholders in our community – from special interest groups, community leaders, business people, individuals – everyone who wants to have a say, regardless of age, gender, geographic location, income, religion, ethnicity or any other factor," Lyn Russell says. "To start the process, we are inviting key stakeholders and community leaders to attend a workshop for a discussion on this exciting program of engagement."

The workshops...

CAIRNS – Monday 2 August
9.30am – 12.30pm Tanks Art Centre, Tank 5, Collins Avenue
4.30pm – 7.30pm Tanks Art Centre, Tank 5, Collins Avenue

GORDONVALE – Friday 6 August
10.30am – 1.30pm RSL Hall, Gordon Street

Light refreshments will be served. If you'd like to attend, RSVP by emailing (include venue and time) to Helen Jarroe, by Wednesday 28 July.

Wednesday, 16 June 2010

Corruption levelled at Cairns Councillor for mixing business with pleasure

For 10 years Councillor Alan Blake has been using a Council-funded mobile telephone for what could amount to tens of thousands of dollars in personal calls.


Since at least 2000, Alan Blake has been using a council-funded mobile telephone account - 0414 708 529 - for his personal businesses.

In late January, I released evidence of his latest business where yet again he was using the official Council mobile telephone to promote and market his private business. It sparked a large response from CairnsBlog readers.

I subsequently put in a formal complaint to Council about Blake's ratepayer-funded phone for his private businesses.

Today's Council finance meeting, chaired by Cr Linda Cooper, will vote if Alan Blake has breached the Councillor's Code of Conduct. Ironically, Alan Blake used to chair this same committee until a majority of his colleagues lost faith with him last July, the only committee chair to be changed. The following month, he was booted out of his office.

Following my complaint, Council commissioned independent investigator Anthony Walsh to undertake a formal investigation. In what Walsh called "Operation Bottlebrush" he found that Blake had breached of the Moral Code of Conduct for Councillors.

“Cr Blake has made an error of judgement in having the mobile telephone number of the Council funded service printed on the subject business cards," Walsh wrote in his report. "To that end we believe that Councillor Blake has committed a minor breach of the Moral Code of Conduct for Councillors (Local Government Act 1993, the Act) in relation to ethics principles for local government councillors."

Chief Executive Officer Lyn Russell says that it is argued that the breach of the Code is a minor breach of Blake’s "ethical obligations with respect of the use of Council entitlements."

Russell said the report was prepared in accordance with Corporate Plan Objectives to ensure that Council is "open, accountable, ethical and financially responsible." "Should Council resolve that a breach has occurred this will then be recorded in [the] 2010/2011 annual report," Lyn Russell says.

Cairns Regional Council, and its predecessor, Cairns City Council, has never granted permission for Blake to use the mobile number for non-Council matters, especially in such an overt and flagrant manner, by advertising it on numerous businesses as a private commercial number.

CairnsBlog is seeking Blake's phone records over the preceding years he has served as an elected councillor.

Whilst the investigation into his latest use of the mobile telephone on a company called "Mogo" failed to get going, the investigator said the intent was there.

Mayor Val Schier, speaking from Canberra this morning, where she is attending the National General Assembly of Local Government, told CairnsBlog that the report is thorough.

"I hope that the Councillors will look at suitable actions to take," Val Schier said. "Lyn's done a good job of getting it investigated and has been very professional about it."

Councillors who talked with CairnsBlog last evening, were quick to express their discomfort with the issue, saying that there should be clear separation and transparency when dealing with public funds.

Councillor Julia Leu said it was a "no brainer" and "so obvious" that councillor-provided mobiles are for official business.

"It's always been understood that it's for council business," Julia Leu said. "There's a zero-tolerance with misuse of a council asset. Who has the time to run another business anyway?"

Councillors are entitled to claim 50 percent of their home telephone costs and also their internet, however some choose not to do this. Councillors Leu and Lesina don't claim this entitlement.

"It's certainly inappropriate," Kirsten Lesina said. "I have a personal mobile as well, and rarely use the council one for any other calls." Lesina said her monthly mobile bill is between $100 and $160, and there's usually a few dollars of personal calls she pays for. "Yes, it's like not much at all, maybe $10, but I have my own mobile for that."

Both Councillor Pyne and Forsyth said it was "totally inappropriate" to use a council-paid mobile for personal use.

Councillor Paul Gregory says there's "some grey areas" that he will seek advice from the finance team.

"The grey areas to me are whether or not the policy was articulated to him [Blake] initially or not," Gregory said. "There is an opportunity to use his old phone number and pay it back. Whether or not he's made a bad error of judgement, one that I would have personally got clear beforehand, I'll have to wait and see. There is some thought going around that this is a code of conduct breach."

"My phone for example, is my own phone, it was clearly articulated to me," Paul Gregory said. "The old Council policy [pre-2008] was simply to get a phone allowance. Under this new Council, Blackberrys were provided if you wished, but I didn't want to do that. I'm still a bit leery about the technology and seen them breaking down. But we have a policy around this phone."

Some councillors confirmed that Alan Blake had boasted on previous occasions that he doesn't have a personal mobile and he "charges it all up."

"It's clear to me and anyone that the Council mobile is for Council business," Diane Forsyth said. "I have two mobiles, and don't use my Council mobile for personal stuff hardly at all. You really shouldn't even have to be told."

The investigator says the the intent to operate Blake's private business was surely there at some point.

"To that end as the business cards had been printed with the mobile telephone number of a service paid for by Council, it would seem that there was intent on that part of Councillor Blake to have used those business cards to promote the business," Anthony Walsh said. "In light of the evidence gathered and the admissions made by Councillor Blake, we believe he have made an error of judgement. We believe he has breached the following ethics principle:
  • 'Councillors must conduct themselves in a way that promotes and maintains the public's trust and confidence in the local government and the good rule and government of its area...'
In Blake's four-page submission, he says the due process was not followed.

"I have not been afforded procedural fairness," Alan Blake said. "[The] findings are not supported by facts. Alternative findings or conclusions are not considered. The report does not explain why the conduct is determined to be a breach."

"I believe that the complaint is frivolous and vexatious, that the investigator failed to follow the Code of Conduct in managing the complaint, that a biased investigation has been conducted to intimidate and discredit me as a councillor, and that I have been prejudged," Alan Blake said. "For this reason the report is flawed and must be rejected."

However, this was not the view of the independent investigator.

"This finding is evidenced by the complaint from Mr Moore insofar as a concern was raised that the Council funded mobile telephone was being used in the conduct of the business 'Mogo'," Anthony Walsh said. "That no personal benefit by Councillor Blake would not appear to mitigate the public doubt raised by the production.... of the business cards."

However Blake says that my CairnsBlog complaint about his use of the Council mobile, is "a continuation of a well orchestrated slanderous campaign driven politically to undermine my ability to perform the duties of my office." He's called the attacks "cyber-bullying".

The Mogo business was to be a bluetooth transmitting "push" message service, where mobile uses would receive advertising when they were in range of the transmitter.

Deputy Mayor Margaret Cochrane acted as Blake's 'support person' during the investigator's interview.

When Blake was questioned by the investigator, who organised the printing of the business cards, he said he couldn't remember.

"I would have been jointly involved in the decision to print the cards but I cannot recall whether I or Jason organised for the cards to be printed," Alan Blake said.

"I had nothing to do with the printing at all," Jason Greg, Blake's former business partner told CairnsBlog. "He took them to the printer, Lotsa I think it was. He ordered them. He paid for them by his cheque account. Blake knows exactly what he did."

Alan Blake says that even though 1,000 cards were printed, he says that "less than ten" were distributed.

"The only person who had access to the business card other than myself and a family member, was Dr Jason Gregg," Alan Blake said. "He became aggrieved when I decided not to proceed with the venture."

"Well that's an outright lie," Jason Gregg said. "He handed them out all over at Blue Sky [Brewery]. Definitely, absolutely, unequivocally. I was sitting there when he gave many of the cards out. He even gave a bunch of them to Kerie Hull, because Kerie wanted to be the manager of that company."

"How does Blake get away with this?" Jason Gregg said. "You see at that stage he was my friend, but that was before he fucked me over royally. His whole life went to that Blackberry. I arranged for a Motorola Razar (mobile) for him to use, and that's how I found he was *** with my ex-wife [Carla]," Jason Gregg said. "Carla contacted Blake via email and sent it to the wrong phone. From the tone and content, it was obvious that they had colluded to strip me of the business all along, even though it was my idea."

"I spent six months building it [Mogo] and I was an equal 'partner'.. I just happened to have the phone in my possession at the time, and she screwed up and sent it to the wrong phone rather than the infamous Blackberry," Jason Gregg said. "That's how is all ended between us. But he would not use that Motorola, he used the [Council] Blackberry for everything."

Gregg says that Blake later claimed that he had illegally intercepted the messages and took the matter to the Blake's favourite agency, the Federal Police.

"They said it was a ridiculous claim, but she then went ahead to take a domestic violence order against me with Blake's encouragement - even though I had not seen or spoken to her for months. Blake was behind all this and she was Blake's partner in the crime," Jason Gregg said.

The investigator asked Blake if he had made any calls on the council mobile in relation to the Mogo business. "No," Blake said in his sworn statement.

What business allows their employees to use a company-provided mobile telephone for marketing and use for employees private unrelated businesses, especially when no permission is granted?

Last year Blake said "if I take care of what I need to do today, without fear or favour, and do what I feel is right, the future will take care of itself".

In words that will now come to haunt him, when Blake sold his Furniture Associates business, he said it was to "focus on council obligations."

"With the added responsibility of the amalgamated council, I found I was becoming time-poor so something had to give," Alan Blake said. Just months later he actively set up new business ventures and again, for the fourth time in ten years, used his Council mobile to market and promote a private business.

You'd have to be dumb as a sewer rat to find this Cairns Regional Councillor not guilty.

This weekend, Alan Blake turns 59 years old. You would think by now, he would have learnt right from wrong.



The "chosen few..." words in this video from the 2008 election campaign will come home to haunt Councillor Alan Blake... now subject to a code of conduct investigation.

Wednesday, 2 September 2009

Cairns Mayor welcomes further False Cape suspension

The Mayor of the Cairns Regional Council has welcomed the decision by the Federal Environment Minister to suspend the False Cape development for a further 12 months.

"Yes, it is great news," Mayor Schier told CairnsBlog soon after hearing the news this afternoon.

"We're very pleased it's been put on hold, again because it's quite clear that they [Reef Cove Ltd] have not fulfilled their obligations to look after the site and put in the sediment control measures."

Over the last year, Cairns Regional ratepayers forked out $150,000 for temporary remediation work on the now-vacant site, after Minister Garrett first suspended development one year ago.

Council plans to send staff over to the beleaguered site next week for an evaluation.

"They will see what additional work will need to be done, and then we'll have to decide who does it and if we do the same work we did last year. It will be a Council decision," Mayor Val Schier said.

Councillor Paul Gregory, whose Division encompasses the False Cape site, says some responsibility should rest with the Federal Government, in helping for ongoing remediation work.

"This [decision] means that it puts the onus back onto Council," Paul Gregory says. "Those works last year were only ever meant for one wet season. It was to put in slit traps were they were desperately needed, along with some grass and vegetation to try and hold things together. It needs more work now."

"My thoughts are with the Minister's declaration, perhaps they could give us a hand and give us a help financially," Councillor Paul Gregory says. "It's in limbo, nobody can do anything. Ratepayers of Cairns are going to have to carry the can again until someone owns that property so that we can charge and claim back. I think it will be something in the $150,000 order again if we are going to have to go back and do those temporary works again."

When asked if the development would ever proceed again, Councillor Gregory said that something has to be done.

"The site can't be left like it is. It's either going to have to be remediated or finished, or the owners of those properties take care of it. This would be much like Bayview Heights, which was a red soil farm when I was a young fella. When it was developed with residential houses on it, those rivers ran red for the first wet season, but now it's vegetated, those issues are gone. When you go into private ownership, those issues will be taken care of," Paul Gregory said.

Councillor Gregory didn't want to look back if the False Cape site should have ever been approved in the first place.

"It goes back a long, long way," Paul Gregory said. "In 2000 the Council had a chance to kill it off but that would have cost the ratepayers a lot of money in compensation, however we made the decision to continue and it was accessed under the CairnsPlan and there was changes in the design and all that sort of thing. I wished it have never happened in the first place, however the history is there, it's been going on for 25 years."

"I think the Federal Government have some responsibility [regarding the cost of remediation works], not because that we [Council] gave the approvals, as we only gave some approvals as directed by certain court cases, but nothing will now happen for two years therefore they should give some money," Gregory said.

"You'd want to have the remediation nailed down before our first wet in two months," Paul Gregory said.

Local environmentalist and landscape photographer, Steven Nowakowski says that it was the former Byrne-led Council, that Paul Gregory was a member of, supported in 2003 /04 sub-dividing the property from 58 lots to 155.

"They also approved to put in a dual road on the site. So it was actually the Byrne-Council that has left this legacy. We have got to stop blaming Joh Bjelke-Petersen and what happened in the mid-80's," Steve Nowakowski says.

"Yes, the land was re-zoned as special facilities in the mid-80's, but it was the Cairns City Council under Kevin Byrne that reconfigured that site to how it is today," Nowakowski says. "That decision went against the advice of his own Council planners at the time."

The tripling of the lots, with the addition of four unit complexes and a Resort, was a Byrne-Council decision.

"I think today's decision is great step forward, it's the right decision, however I'd like to see a complete revocation of the Federal Government's approval. Ultimately what we'd like to see is the government buying back that site, because at the moment it's worth nothing," Steven Nowakowski said.

"For anyone to take on this site, they would have to spend millions and millions of dollars in remediation before they even start. Firstly, it is Council's responsibility because the Kevin Byrne Council never got the $650,000 bond, they never got that bank guarantee from the developer, so yes, it is Council's responsibility, but it's also the Federal Government's responsibility, because it impacts on the Great Barrier Reef, " Steven Nowakowski says.

When asked who should pay, Nowakowski is defiant. "Kevin Byrne should pay out of his back pocket. He's the one that voted for it."

The Save False Cape campaigners have been seeking a government buy back of the land from the receivers, and then involve the Yarabarrah community to revegetate the site, hand the land back to their community," Steve says.

It's understood that Yarrabah Mayor Percy Neal, would like the site returned back to them. Although Community Development Employment Projects funding has ceased in July, discussions with cairns Senator Jan McLucas has indicated that there could be some Federal funding for employment available for locals revegetating the False Cape site.

The land was purchased by the current developer, John Ewens in 2001 for just over $2 million, then sort substantial changes for his Reef Cove resort. The land is now a liability with so much work needed to be done to fix the site up.

With 155 house blocks on the site, Steve Nowakowski estimates that the sale would conservatively generate around $60 million. The developer has probably spent between 20 to $25 million, and Ewens has indicated that he's spent $2 million a month.

It would cost $5 million to get water pumped in from Gordonvale, and the same again to get sewage pumped back to the treatment centre at Gordonvale, and many more millions to get the roads ready for sub-division, ready for houses, units and the resort.

"We estimate that the developer would have to have spent up to $60 million to get it ready for sale, and then only recoup that from sales. There was never ever going to be any money made.

We hear all about these shelf companies that raise a lot of money, spend a portion of the money, and the rest goes missing into the developer’s pocket, then he declares bankrupt or goes into receivership.

Maybe the False Cape fiasco was always designed to fall over from day one?

"Everyone has lost. The community have lost. The environment has lost. Dougie, the excavator driver lost his life. The developer has supposedly lost. Our visual amenity has been lost. The ratepayers have lost $150,000. No one has won out of this," Steve Nowakowski says.

The Save False Cape group will now consider pushing for an enquiry, led by the State or Federal Government about why this has happened.

We should have an enquiry about why the Byrne Council didn't require that $650,000 bank guarantee, why the Mayor ignored his own planners.

According to Yarrabah Councillors, the former Mayor was flown down to the Gold Coast on a number of occasions, put up in a hotel, reputedly paid for by the developer.

"In this day in age, why have we got this far? We may be up for a perpetual $150,000 every year," Nowakowski says.

Cairns Regional Council Mayor Val Schier says it's her belief that the development won't ever proceed.

"They do have approval for 134 lots, however this Council will not give them approval to treat their sewage on site, nor will we give them approval for a second stage of development."

"The $150,000 that Council have spent rehabilitating the site, would have to be repaid, even if the land is sold, so Council will get its money back," Val Schier said.

False Cape’s approval was first suspended in September last year over concerns that the developer’s failure to maintain the site posed a threat to the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area.

The site was left un-managed after the developer closed it down due to financial difficulties.

“Under the national environment law, I can suspend approval for another 12 months if I am not satisfied that appropriate measures have been put in place to protect the nearby world heritage area,” Peter Garrett said.

“The company has failed to fix up the erosion and sediment problems at the site, so a suspension will remain on the development’s approval. This means that building cannot resume at the site until I am satisfied that proper measures will be taken to protect the world heritage area. If the site is sold to a new developer, the suspension will still apply and any new developer will need to satisfy me that the world heritage area can be protected," Garrett said today.

If a new development is proposed for that site, it will need to be considered as a fresh proposal under national environment law and undergo a public assessment.

According to the Minister's statement, the Reef Cove development is the only project to have its approval suspended under the national environment law—the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

"Suspension is not as good as a revocation, but it is at least better than having the approval re-instated," Adam Millar, solicitor at the Environmental Defenders Office, said today.

"It would be a good idea to explore the buy-back options," Millar said.

Many questions remain however.

Local environmentalist, Terry Spackman says that any new developer will have to satisfy that the world heritage area can be protected.

"Will a new owner have to put effective erosion and sediment controls in place as part of the sale conditions?" he asked. "It appears the present owner failed to do this and escaped prosecution."

"Will the law be enforced more rigorously in the future? A recent inspection of the Reef Cove site showed the temporary remediation work ordered by Cairns Council was just that. Large areas of unprotected soil, evidence of recent erosion, slippage on batters and full or near full sediment traps," Spackman said.

"Most of the conditions that led to the suspension remain. Reef Cove remains a threat to the World Heritage Area. Will work be carried out to remove the threat, and who will pay for it?"

Saturday, 8 August 2009

And the winners are

Cairns Regional Council have presented awards tonight for the best gardens.

70 gardens entered this year in 21 categories, with Julie Roach, a horticulturalist with Townsville City Council as this year's judge.

“All gardens were judged on the efficient use of water as a fundamental aspect, with water saving technologies and the reduction of evaporation through use of mulch and shade high priorities,” Mayor Schier said at tonight's function.

“Council is proud of the area’s natural environment and private and public gardens are a big part of the regional beauty and preservation.”

SO, without further ado, here's the winners of the Cairns Regional Council Garden Awards for 2009:
  • Residential Categories

    Home Garden (large) over 500²m
    1st Place: Robyn & Larry Butler, 129 Upham Rd., Miriwinni
    2nd Place: Richard and Michelle Bond, 3 Amos Crt. Redlynch
    Incentive: John & Alice Gray, 11 Whynabeel Road, Miallo

    Home Garden (small) under 500²m
    1st Place: Corey Frahn, 26 Johnston Rd., Mossman
    2nd Place: Bev Reaston, 9 Monica Cl., Holloways Beach
    2nd Place : Michelle Cooke, 54 Booyong Dr., Mt Sheridan

    New Home Garden
    1st Place: Michelle Cooke, 54 Booyong Dr., Mt Sheridan
    2nd Place: Richard & Anne-Maree Lindeman, 11 Fireclay Close
    Incentive: Lin & Ron Hill, 9 Monterey St., Kewarra Beach

    Front Garden
    1st Place: Bev Reaston, 9 Monica Cl., Holloways Beach
    2nd Place: Anna& Stephen Billingham, 10 Read Peak Blvd., Caravonica
    Incentive: Robert & Joanne Lamprey, 7 Gallery Drive, Forest Gardens

    Native Garden
    1st Place: Jennifer Lawton & David Johnson, 54 -56 Chatham Tce., Smithfield
    Incentive: Marta Munoz, 12 Canecutter Rd, Edmonton

    Outdoor Living Area
    1st Place: Corey Frahn, 26 Johnston Rd., Mossman
    2nd Place: Carmel Peaty, 86 King St., Gordonvale
    Incentive: Rita & Joe Vasconcelos, 6 Eden Crt., Clifton Beach

    Pensioners & Seniors Garden (Large)
    [large garden, not pensioner. -ed]
    1st Place: Eva Lancini, 3 Tallow Wood Cl., Redlynch
    2nd Place: Eva & Frank Batowski, Lot 125 Windlass St, Goldsborough
    Incentive: Beryl Watson, 22 Portsea Cst., Kewarra Beach

    Pensioners & Seniors Garden (Small)
    1st Place: Bev Reaston, 9 Monica Cl., Holloways Beach
    2nd Place: Jack Hallas, 30 Monterey St., Kewarra Beach
    Incentive: Julie Martin, 7/63 Pease St., Manoora
    Incentive: Lyn Thomas Hale, 17/24 Suhle St., Edmonton

    Unit/Balcony Garden
    1st Place: Jennette Anderson, Unit 1, 1 – 9 Jones St., Bungalow
    2nd Place: Bernie Bergin, Unit 46/28C Grove St., Parramatta Park
    Incentive: Lesley Waynes, 3/201 McCormack St., Cairns

    Vegetable/Herb Garden
    1st Place: Carmel Peaty, 86 King St., Gordonvale
    2nd Place: Eva & Frank Bastowski, Lot 125 Windlass St., Goldsborough

    Waterwise (Residential)
    1st Place: Eva & Frank Basatowski

    Judges Choice
    Bev Reaston, 9 Monica Cl., Holloways Beach

  • Non Residential Categories

    Tourist Accommodation 4 Star & Over
    1st Place: Sanctuary Palm Cove
    2nd Place: The Lakes resort & Spa
    Incentive: Shawtara Resort

    Tourist Accommodation Under 4 Star
    1st Place: Cairns Colonial Club
    2nd Place: Daintree Rainforest Resort
    Incentive:

    School Grounds
    1st Place: Hambledon State School
    2nd Place: Trinity Anglican School (White Rock)
    Incentive: Trinity Anglican School (Kewarra Beach)

    Private Hospitals & Nursing Homes
    1st Prize: Morinda

    Retirement Villages
    1st Place: Aveo The Parks Retirement Village
    2nd Place: Heritage Gardens Retirement Village
    Incentive: Woodward Retirement Village

    Caravan/Camping Grounds
    1st Place: Fishery Falls Holiday Park

    Commercial Premises
    1st Place: Cairns Tropical Zoo
    2nd Place: Santai (Units)
    Incentive: Seclusions

    Community Garden
    1st Place: Woodward Retirement Village
    2nd Place: St Johns Lifestyle Care
    Incentive: St Mary’s By The Sea

    Waterwise Garden (non-residential)
    Cairns Tropical Zoo

CEC's Lavis property plan before Council

Cairns CEC construction chief, Roy Lavis wants to sub-divide his massive lot of land above Earlville, a plan that has enraged locals. The vote will go before Wednesday's planning and environment meeting agenda of the Cairns Regional Council.
According to Councillor Kirsten Lesina, there are two applications. "One deals with the 1 lot into 2 subdivision, and one that deals with the easement for the driveway," she says.
"Both are recommended for approval subject to conditions. The approval for the one lot into two is conditioned in such a way that another subdivision will not be possible," Lesina says.
"Two large tracts of the land would be transferred to Council as public reserve, and environmental covenants would be placed over a substantial amount of the two house lots. It will also be impossible under the State Government's 2031 plan to subdivide the property again as it is under 60ha and outside the urban footprint," Councillor Lesina says.
Councillor Lesina says the application is recommended for approval, subject to fairly stringent conditions.
"This will mean that almost 70% of the whole parcel of land will either be transferred to Council as reserve or have environmental covenants placed upon it," Lesina says. "The site is also outside the urban footprint of the FNQ 2031 Regional Plan meaning that in future, it cannot be subdivided if it is less than 60ha. The whole parcel is only 30ha."
However, John Martin of the Mansfield Street community action group is still concerned about the proposal for the hillside subdivision.
"It is disappointing to read the report and we are still concerned that after all is said and done, there will be a loop-hole we were not aware that will negate all the hard work," John Martin says.
"The Council department responsible for looking at the Lavis application has released a report, and it's not all good news. It has recommended approving the application but with conditions," Martin says.
He says that the conditions sound okay until taken in the context of the past history of the people concerned.
"At this point the Councillors are not bound to approve it, but it makes it harder for them to not approve it. Personally, my concern is that following rules and conditions is not a strong personality trait of people in the development business, as we have seen already. How these conditions can be enforced is also a concern."
"There is only one sure way, don't approve the application. If the council could ensure that all the conditions were going to be met I could personally see that it might be acceptable. I don't wish to be a 'protest regardless' person," John Martin says. "But, I still do have concerns. My major concern is that so far Mr Lavis has never allowed himself to be limited by rules. That has been the cornerstone of our protest. He also works on the principle that there is no rule that cannot be applied to be changed. After all isn't that what he is doing now?"
Price, who's community group represents nearly 100 local residents, questions the comments that the block is not amenable to further development.
"Since this issue has arisen, several blocks of similar geographical type have been developed and built on to the south of the Lavis block, proving that where the intent is there any of the hill side is amenable to further development as long as someone gets the urge," John Martin said.
"I have not been able to find specifically what sections of the block are to be transferred to public ownership."
The action group have also asked how Council plan to monitor the conditions.
"For how long and how frequently? Who is responsible for ensuring the monitoring? If the property is already less than 60 hectares, then how can it be divided further if it is subject to FNQ 2031? And if it can be divided now, how does FNQ 2031 then apply only later?" John Martin asks.
The Council report, and also the second issue of the road built without approval, are available on the Mansfield Street website.

Thursday, 11 June 2009

Power to the people!

In the wash-up following Briggs' resignation as CEO of the Cairns Regional Council, it's worth recording a few observations

Although CairnsBlog has certainly been a player in the issues surrounding the Cash For Comments affair, Mike Moore has just been reflecting the general community outrage at the goings on at the Cairns Regional Council; providing the means and opportunity for ratepayers to make comment.

Not detracting from the efforts here on CairnsBlog, I admit I've not been crusading alone, not by a long shot.

CBD Warrior commented the other day that this blog is "read by a couple hundred malcontents [and] had ZERO to do with Briggs' departure”. However, he/she is missing the point. For every reader of CairnsBlog, there are probably 10 others who felt just as passionately about the issue of openness and accountability. For the record, the number of unique daily hits to this Blog is way over a couple of hundred. Google Analytics shows 4,347 unique regular readers, and such web monitoring programs, rarely capture every reader.

When the Cash for Comments story erupted five weeks ago, quite a few people in the community had had enough. Information started arriving at CairnsBlog by email, by post and by phone, some even my unmarked envelope – mostly anonymously, from ordinary residents and ratepayers. On one occasion, I received a phone call, with the number withheld, advising about Councillor Blake’s car had just been seen. Later another call, from someone else, and then another. Information not sought, but willingly given.

Another commenter on CairnsBlog mentioned Watergate. Well there have been a few 'Deep Throats' out there – long may they continue.

All the supporters who have made comment on my various stories, should also share the credit; even Quickie seemed to shift his ground at the end. That was good.

When the Cairns Post seemed to lose its patience and joined the fray in calling for the release of the Henry report last Thursday, I think that Mr Briggs finally got the message that his actions would not be tolerated by the ratepayers of Cairns and the former Douglas Shire.

There are some people out there who have, and will want to continue, to demonise CairnsBlog. I'm not a lone wolf in the wilderness. Thousands, of residents have had a gutful of the shenanigans of this Council. In these times we need good civic government. If it was there in the first place, none of the last few weeks would ever have happened.

So the challenge is for the Councillors to now take heed of what one wit has termed 'Cairns people’s power' and either fall on their swords, or pick up their game and actually work to represent the interest of the Cairns community and just not their own narrow special interest agenda.

To represent, to govern and to protect ratepayers. Is that too much to ask for?

Wednesday, 10 June 2009

Cairns Council CEO resigns, leaves immediately

The CEO of Cairns Regional Council, Noel Briggs resigned this afternoon.

Mayor Val Schier said Noel Briggs would leave Council effective immediately.

“Noel has played a role in transitioning the two former councils of Douglas and Cairns into Cairns Regional Council and I wish him well with his future endeavours,” she said.

Cr Schier said council would soon advertise to fill the permanent CEO position.

“I will be managing that process with the assistance of the Deputy Mayor and with support from senior staff,” Schier said.

Council's Director of Planning, Peter Tabulo, will be appointed to the Acting Chief Executive Officer.

In an email to all staff this afternoon at 3:30pm, Mayor Val Schier announced the Chief Executive Officer's resignation.

"Many of you will have worked with Noel over a number of years in this and previous Councils and will appreciate the hard work and dedication he has put into local government in this region," Schier said.

"For all staff it is be business as usual and I look forward to working with you to continue the great work of this organisation."

When questioned this afternoon, Val Schier said it was "Mr Briggs' decision and Mr Briggs' alone."

Briggs' shock resignation comes hot on the heels of the Cash for Comments investigation. The CEO admitted he was one of those questioned by Jim Henry QC, following which the CEO and Mayor were both widely criticised for not making the report public, allowing for speculation about it's findings.

The Mayor stopped short in her message to staff, to personally thank the CEO for his contribution.

CAIRNSBLOG COVERAGE :

Wednesday, 3 June 2009

Pyne calls for total accountability

Councillor Rob Pyne has called for the report into Cairns Regional Council’s ‘Cash for Comments’ controversy, including the cost of the report, to be made public.

The decision on the report will be determined at a special closed meeting at midday today.

“This report will say something about Council Operations and the extent to which the Mayor is involved or sidelined when important decisions are made,” Councillor Rob Pyne said.

“As a Councillor you are told you must never instruct staff and that most of what Council does is ‘Operational’ and the business of the CEO and Council staff. Well that is fine, but if public officials are making all these decisions, then they need to be made accountable too”.

“To maintain public confidence, the CEO must ensure the full report is tabled. If this does not happen, because senior staff are involved, the allegation will be that there is a ‘cover up’. The only way this can be avoided, is if the report is made public."

"As is often the case, this is another example of justice not only being done, but being seen to be done," Robert Pyne said.

At today’s meeting, Councillor Pyne will:
  • Move to have the Henry Report received and tabled,
  • Move that it be made public and provided to the media,
  • Request the full cost of the ‘investigation’ be made public; and
  • Suggest the report be referred to the Department of Local Government for their perusal and advice.

May I seek your indulgence

Former Cairns Councillor, Ross Parisi has written an open letter to all Cairns Regional Councillors, about the secret meeting that is being held today:

  • 2nd June 2009

    Re: Henry Special Investigation Report

    Dear Councillor,

    If I may seek your indulgence in highlighting several items of interest concerning the ‘Cash for Comment’ Special Investigation.

    I understand on Wednesday 3rd June at a closed meeting of the Cairns Regional Council, the CEO will be tabling his Executive Report on the Henry Investigation. Not to be tabled is the Henry Investigation Report in its entirety.

    As per the CEO letter dated the 29th May to all Councillors, the CEO indicated he would not be tabling the latter Report per see, as Staff members were interviewed and assurances were given by the CEO to Staff that their evidence would not be made public. This assurance I believe was beyond his authority as CEO in the circumstances and may have erred in law.

    I see no problem with the implementation of a Staff confidentiality policy when it relates to matters pertaining to personnel employments details. However, I do not believe this confidentiality extends to matter otherwise and certainly not to matters covered by this investigation.

    If one were to extend this confidentiality clause, then it could very well be extended to matters to do with maladministration and matters pertaining thereto. I am certain it was not the intent of the Staff confidentiality policy at the time of adoption to protect Staff in matters similar to what is now before Council.

    Notwithstanding, the above assertions, a mute point does remain: when does the Private interest of an individual exceed the overall Public interest, in so much as to prevent the tabling of the Henry Report.

    There is a disturbing amount of public disquiet arising as a result of this matter and allegations of a lack of transparency have been levelled at the proposed action/s of the CEO.

    Furthermore, the veracity of the evidence contained within the Henry Report is in itself challenged on the premise that the personal interviews were not conducted under Oath. Therefore, what legal weight can be apportioned to such evidence heard.

    Another matter of community disquiet is that the author of the proposed Executive Report is the CEO, who by his own admission on the local ABC is part of the investigation. It is my belief that a possible conflict of interest can be made against the CEO.

    If this is so, the CEO ought to exclude himself and not to be present in the Chamber while the Councillors are deliberating on the evidence relating to the CEO, other than to make a personal submission relating to matters raised concerning his actions.

    It is my assertion that Council should request Investigator Henry to make the necessary recommendations arising from his primary report for Council to consider.

    Council should record in its Minutes, resolutions to encapsulate the intent and letter of the above mentioned observations.

    It should be noted that the ultimate authority does rest with Council and Councillors on all matters pertaining to all issues raised herein and not with the CEO.

    Wishing you well in Council’s deliberations. Thank you for taking the time and effort to read this email.

    I look forward to your acknowledgment.

    Sincerely,
    Ross Parisi

Tuesday, 2 June 2009

Council needs to be transparent

Following my revelation last Thursday about the collusion of a Councillor and a very senior staff member at Cairns Regional Council, at the height of the Cash for Comments saga, more pictures have emerged from the weekend that collaborate the original story.

The separation of power is such a vital part of our democracy. Where there's grounds for perceived suspicions where wrong-doing could be occurring, or conflicts of interest could be seen, then these need to be declared openly and honestly. That is part of being in public office and serving the people. It is also clearly stated in the Councillor's Code of Conduct.

Furthermore, ratepayers of this region deserve transparency in their elected representatives and the way in which they make decisions. Like it or not, they are not just ordinary citizens, and they should expect the scrutiny that goes with the territory of Public Office. Taking an Oath before the people, an event I witnessed last March, is something taken very seriously. It is a calling they, and they alone, choose to take. It comes with great responsibility.
On Saturday morning, two neighbours reported that the chief of Council's Finance Committee, Councillor Alan Blake, was indeed back in the neighbourhood, visiting Kerie Hull, Council's Corporate Communications Manager.

My investigation on this matter is not in isolation. What people do in their lives is of little concern to me, nor should it be to anyone. But these at not just everyday people. They are paid substantial salaries by the public purse. Both were also interviewed by QC Henry as part of the extensive Cash for Comments investigation into the arrangement between Council and Radio 4CA. I'm written extensively about this previously, and showed that both Blake and Hull had involvement, at the very early stage, most probably in an attempt to undermine the Mayor.

As most CairnsBlog readers will know, Councillor Blake threatened me with legal action two weeks ago. It was the old infamous Byrne tatic in a vain attempt to use the Council's lawyer at the Ratepayer's expense, and silence me. His actions as a senior and one would hope, experienced Councillor after already serving two terms, is one for public scrutiny. There's nothing improper about that, when there's a perceived inappropriateness.

Following my release of photos last Thursday, Alan Blake emailed a message to Councillors Cooper, Bonneau, and the Deputy Mayor Cochrane, saying they were made up, and there was no truth in them. Other commentors on this Blog called them fabricated and that they were bodged up in Photoshop, that the 'focal length' was wrong. All many of ideas came forward, in an attempt to protect and defend the Councillor. Well, they were real. I have an Affidavit from the photographer, and I researched and checked their authenticity prior to publication. I even asked for the Councillor's comments for two weeks before publishing, but he didn't want to discuss the matter. What a shame, I could have thrown them in the bin if he did.

Why does it matter if Blake is in private discussions with Council's Corporate Communications Manager, Kerie Hull anyway? It matters a great deal. In fact, it matters more now than a week ago, because we now have learnt the that QC's investigation into the Cash for Comments matters, reputedly costing anything between $20,000 to $45,000, goes well beyond who said what.

My information tells me that the Report identifies a Council that permits and allows a culture of poor processes, such as the under-mining of the Mayor and others, to exist and permeate. A culture that, under the leadership of Noel Briggs, has caused many of Council's 1000 staff, to feel very concerned about the health of their workplace. The conduct of some Councillors and senior staff, is a clear example of this covert and manipulating culture in action. It is also Briggs' plan to entomb the QC's Report, so that no one will ever see it.

That's why this matters.

There's also another interesting connection in all this. On the official Council webpage of Councillor Alan Blake, there's the declaration of "gifts over $500' as well as memberships of various organisations. There's a declaration of in the form of a cheque from an R. Payne/M. Huelin for $2,000. These are no less than the names that appear on the Williams Graham Carman website as Partners, that same folk that Alan Blake has used to take legal proceedings against myself and CairnsBlog two weeks ago.

Here is Alan Blake's bank statement, showing the deposit of donations:


...and here's the declaration of Payne's contribution to Councillor Alan Blake's re-election campaign:

Collusion and separation in power is so very important. The public and all ratepayers deserve honesty and transparency in their government, at all levels.

It's tough being in government these days, however, when things are hidden, as is the Cairns Regional Council CEO's desire to lock up the Investigator report so that no one will ever see, it will be the biggest miscarriage of justice in Cairns for a very long time. We must not allow this culture at our Council to continue to erode and damage the institution of democracy any longer.

Just to end up, here's a few weekend snaps of Alan Blake's car, minutes after he arrived at Kerie Hull's place on Saturday morning.

Telstra has a lot to answer the phone for

In light of the Telstra former chief, Sol Trujillo's comments where he said:

  • "Australia is racist, backward and like stepping back in time."

    "My point is that [racism] does exist and it's got to change because the world is full of a lot of people and most economies have to take advantage - including Australia - of a diverse set of people."

    "If there is a belief that only a certain people are acceptable versus others, that is a sad state."

This outburst followed Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's "Adios,'' as Mexican-born Sol's departed from Telstra and Australia's shore, calling Rudd's language as racist.

I think, for all those that attack he tenure at the head of Telstra, really need to look at a bigger picture, one of the corporatisation of many large businesses, including the telecommunications giant. This has often signaled their downfall, as it has with NewsLTD in terms of a personal relationship their customers and staff.

I strongly encourage anyone interested in the darker side of business evolution over the last 20 years, take in The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. Writer Joel Bakan considers the modern corporation as a class of person and evaluated its behaviour towards society, as a psychologist might evaluate a person.

Many comparisons are even valid for our own Cairns Regional Council, where the corporate chiefs and culture have little respect for the ratepayers. This often extends to elected Councillors. I've experienced the wrath of senior Council staff in the media and communications unit, where folk like Sonja Anderson and Kerie Hull appear to have little understanding about what it means to be a public servant.

You'll all have you hate stories about dealing with a large business, from being put on hold to simply not treating you as their most important asset.

So here's a relevant story, a true story, which deserves reflection. It's a story from a Telstra employee.

  • Stephanie was a pretty, lithe teenager with the type of athletic body shape most women could only dream about. Home movies of her shown in the backyard swimming pool reveal a pretty, laughing girl full of fun and mischief and absolutely stunning in a yellow bikini.

    When Stephanie was seventeen, she left high school and secured an administrative position with Telecom Australia. Her parents were delighted that their daughter had secured a "safe Government" job.

    "You'll never have to work in your life," her father told her jovially.

    Stephanie worked hard in her entry level administrative position and climbed up to an Administrative Service Officer, Class 3 by the time she was 21. She was happy in her job and proud of her achievements.

    Then Telecom corporatised and became Telstra. Those were some anxious days for Stephanie, wondering if her position was safe or not.

    However, she was given an option. To take an early redundancy package or to transfer to Brisbane and become a Callcentre Operator with the new Telstra.

    Stephanie decided she would move to "the big smoke" and eagerly moved her few possessions to a flat in Indooroopilly.

    The Call centre was different from the processing and client service position she had in the Far North. She had no physical contact with people off the street, and she had lost all her friends when she made the move to Brisbane.

    Stephanie was lonely and stressed out. She turned to food as a comfort. Soon her lithe body blossomed and kept on blossoming.

    She struggled with her job, seeking counselling services and having long phone conversations with her Mother who assured her that she needed to "stick it through" because "things would get better".

    However, it was never better. As a Call centre operator, she found her supervisor and others higher up in the hierarchy listening in on her calls, and she was frequently taken into a room and given lectures over what she said or might have said or should have said. Then Telstra advised the call centre staff they had to sell products and each person would be given a target of sales per month.

    Stephanie struggled with this, sometimes making up the sales quota by selling herself or her sisters, a new mobile phone. Work became a frightening drudge. She eagerly welcomed the week-ends and dreaded Monday mornings.

    Then calls were timed, and Stephanie found herself being cut off while answering client enquiries.

    The work environment became toxic with some of the weaker staff turning into tale-bearers and spying on the staff.

    Stephanie found she could cope with all the new stressors by having a couple of drinks of white wine at home at night. Over a frighteningly short period of time, she found she was drinking a full cask of white wine a night.

    Her weight continued to balloon. After a few years, she was 110 kgs. The lithe, athletic body was gone. In place was this bloated, liquid filled balloon like figure.
    Even her delicate pretty facial features had disappeared, pulled out of shape and around the balloon shaped face.

    She had no friends, so she bought several dogs home from the RSPCA refuge, once she had bought herself a modest weatherboard cottage. She lavished attention on them.

    Her Mother fretted she didn't hear from Stephanie enough. Stephanie told her she had a very active social life.

    Stephanie's Mum passed away suddenly and relatives were shocked at Stephanie's morbidly overweight appearance. At the funeral she assured people she was on a medically supervised dieting regime.

    She went back to Brisbane, and kept in touch with her ailing father, who had suffered a debilitating heart attack following the death of his wife.

    Sometime following this, Stephanie was given a redundancy package and made to take the early retirement. She was only 42. She did not tell her father or sisters.

    No-one knows what happened exactly. We know that her neighbours became very concerned one day at hearing howling dogs locked inside her home, and hearing them scratch away at the front door.

    One neighbour phoned the RSPCA who visited the home, and who forced the door open.

    The dogs burst outside, ravenously hungry.

    The RSPCA officer nervously walked inside the dirty, untidy home, and quickly smelt a strong odour. He phoned the Police.

    Inside, the police found the remains of Stephanie. Her dogs had almost devoured every bit of flesh on her body. To obtain a positive identification, her ailing father was approached to give a sample of DNA.

    Stephanie is buried today at the Townsville Crematorium. I go there once a year and say Hello to her. She was my late husband's cousin.

    Stephanie's story is just one of many terrible stories emerging after the corporatisation of Telstra.

Twitterjacking.. or fake Twitter accounts

John from Kuranda writes.....

As Twitter continues to take off and people catch on to its potential to direct traffic online, we’re seeing more and more fake accounts building up on the network.

Like most things on Twitter, setting up an account is trivial. There’s no means of verification at the point of sign-up and the service is dependent on its users for exposing the charlatans.

So we see fake accounts established for a whole range of unsuspecting celebrities and organisation. Exposed already have been fake accounts for amongst other, the Dalai Lama, George W Bush and Kayne West.

Here in Cairns we have seen fake Twitter accounts purporting to be Cairns Regional Council and even CairnsBlog. Council have formally requested that this is closed down. I suspect that that is just the tip of the iceberg.

Twitter has attempted to put some structure in place with its Twitter Rules. But Twitter is a unique site in that, as long as they are parodies, fake accounts are not prohibited by their terms of service. But according to Twitter:
  • "The profile information on a parody account must make it obvious that the profile is fake, or it is subject to removal from Twitter.com. "
There is a fine line between parody sites and those that are blatantly untrue and dripping with malice aforethought.

Twitter needs to sort out its architectural issues and start to deal in a meaningful way with its signup and verification processes. Otherwise the twitterjacking phenomenon is going to be one to watch.

I don’t think it will go away in the immediate future; it’s just going to get a bit more sophisticated. Plus Twitter may be a potential target for cyber-criminals looking to spread malicious links. Already there is an on-line market for the buying and selling of fake Twitter sites.

Enter also to the wonderful world of spam and scams – both seem to be flourishing thanks to Twitter. Think about it. Set up, for instance a fake Twitter for Kevin Rudd. How soon would it take to have a 1000 people sign up? And it would take just a few seconds to send a span/scam message to all thousand.

So in the end it is really a case of Caveat emptor, - let the buyer beware - with Twitter. Before blindly signing up to follow tweets, check out to make sure that it is the tweeter you think it is.


Finally, if you are a frequent Twitterer, keep your virus protection software up to date and run it regularly.

Monday, 1 June 2009

Cairns Post issues apology to Mayor

Following my exposure of the hate-filled letter in the Cairns Post on Saturday, they have issued an apology to both the Mayor, and arthritis sufferers.
In today's Post apologised to those "who were offended by a letter on the topic."
Good on them for doing that, however, the real question is why it was published in the first place.
I think that the letter writer as well, one Jeff Barnes of Callum Street, Mooroobool, needs to apologise as well.

Didn't get your letter published?

Following a reader suggestion, I am pleased to announce a new regular CairnsBlog column, for all those that have sent a letter or online message to the Cairns Post, but it was never published.

Simply email CairnsPostSaidNo@CairnsBlog.net and I'll share it with the world.
Meanwhile, in Saturdays and also this morning's edition of the region's favourite daily, there's no mention what so ever about the Cash for Comments Investigator's report that is being locked away by Cairns Regional Council CEO? Why's that?

Caesar judging Caesar

The last six weeks has seen the Cairns Regional Council embroiled in the under-mining of Val Schier and her role as Mayor.

As ratepayers, we have paid - several thousand dollars a day for a QC. “It will be a tidy sum, I imagine,” Deputy Mayor Margaret Cochrane said. “It is ratepayers' money and I think that probably is something that should be made public.”

The bottom line is that after this long horrible messy incident, sparked by disloyality and lack of professionalism to carry out their Councillors’ duties, the public are screaming out for an open and transparent Council.

Former councillor Ross Parisi, and Cairns
Blog columnist, says that the CEO should step aside from the process completely, as he himself is one of those investigated in the report.


I am not in the least concerned about the payment of $250 for 1 hour of the Mayor been available to listeners for interrogation on the John Mackenzie talk back show. If this was advertising for the Mayor to go on radio, and it wasn’t, this would have been quite a good deal for the ratepayers of Cairns.

Considering the hiatus that existed between Val and John, it was obvious during the first interview following Val’s election in 2008, John was nevertheless prepared to have Val continue the ritual of the weekly chat as was the case with former Mayor Kevin Byrne.

However, it was Val that hesitated and did not want to appear weekly, for reasons which I will not go into here. Any subsequent reproach by Val to turn the clock back 15 months and do a weekly appearance was going to come at a price.

The Machiavellian politics and disloyalty that has resulted from this scenario has been ventilated by scorned Councillor and Staff with mischievous and vindictive personal agendas. It appears to me that the plot to embarrass the Mayor may stems from the top and near top of the Staff chain which makes it ever more treacherous.

The CEO of the Cairns Regional Council is proposing that the Henry Report into the conduct of Councillors and Staff remain confidential and entombed forever, thereby overriding the Public Interest. This is abhorrent to every instinct in my body.

What I find abhorrent is that the CEO and his actions as confirmed by his own admission on the ABC Far North radio on Friday evening, that he himself forms part of the Henry Investigation, and yet the CEO proposes to do an executive report on the Henry report. A case of Caesar judging Caesar is created.

The CEO should not be preparing the Executive Report to the Cairns Regional Council.
Instead, if at all, the Council should this Wednesday be appointing an independent delegate of the CEO to prepare any Executive Report, as allowed for under the Local Government Act 1993

When this report is finally tabled for consideration, the CEO Briggs should leave the Council Chambers when the deliberations are taking place. This is because Briggs’, by his own admission on ABC Far North, forms part of the Investigator’s Report:

  • “I have had zero involvement in the process… The situation affects myself and the mayor and myself and a senior staff member.”
    -
    Council CEO Noel Briggs, Friday 29th May, 2009 ABC Far North

For a democracy to function satisfactorily, justice not only has to be done, but as importantly, it must be seen to be done. The actions need to be transparent and must stand the test of scrutiny.

If breached, the fabric of our rule of law would be adversely compromised and the tenuous tenure of trust between Government and its people, would be questioned.

In this instance, the Council must at all times ensure that its integrity is not tarnished with accusations of a cover up. The appearance of arrogance must not prevail. It must override the intention of the CEO to keep the Report secret and move to make the Henry Report public.
For the purposes of clarity, following is the letter emailed to all Councillors. The operative parts are highlighted thus:

  • From: Noel Briggs
    Sent: Friday, 29 May 2009 10:55 AM
    Subject: Investigation

    Councillors,

    Further to my
    email dated 28 May 2009, I have received a request to provide a full copy of Mr Henry SC's report to all councillors and to the public at large.

    As Chief Executive Officer of Council, I engaged Mr Henry SC to gather information and make findings concerning a small subset of issues which form part of a wider investigation being conducted by me.

    Mr Henry's report is confidential and contains information about, and statements made by, a number of employees of Council.

    Each employee who was part of Mr Henry's investigation was provided with an undertaking that any information or statements made by employees would remain strictly confidential and would not be made public at any time.

    Quite apart from the express undertakings which I made to each employee involved in the investigation, it would be inappropriate for me to disclose to Council (or indeed, the general public), confidential employee information which forms part of Mr Henry's report.

    In closed session at next week's Council meeting, I will be providing to all Councillors an executive summary of the report which has been prepared by Mr Henry.

    Mr Henry has ensured that the executive summary is framed in a way that not only maintains the confidence of the employees involved in the investigation, but provides findings in relation to the subset of issues which he was asked to investigate.

    I will also be providing a report prepared by me which reports completely on the Council's commercial arrangement with prime radio (4CA), as I have been asked to do.

    For the reasons outlined above, I will not be supplying a full copy of the report to any Councillors or any member of the public at any time.

    I am conscious of my obligations to employees and to Council and in line with those responsibilities and duties, my position will not change in relation to the disclosure of the report.

    I will shortly be forwarding a notice of meeting in accordance with my email dated 28 May 2009.

    Noel Briggs
    Chief Executive Officer
    Cairns Regional Council

The tenor of the above letter sent to Councillors under the CEO's signature, is disturbing and couched in words that are intended to protect the anonymity of staff and Councillors who were interviewed and may yet be the subject of maladministration.

If one was to extend the CEO’s argument of anonymity it would then follow that any errant Councillor, staff would be immune from further action because it may embarrass them. If this is the case, it is preposterous, untenable and a perverting the course of justice.

Furthermore, I personally find it astonishing that the Henry Report, and the evidence contained therein, was obtained without the interviewee been under Oath, will not even be given to the Councillors for their perusal. They will have to accept the word of a CEO who quite possibly was one of those interviewed.


Is it because the CEO does not trust the Councillors for whatever reason? If this is the case, then what hope do we have of this administration functioning in the interest of its people.

This Wednesday the 3rd of June, if the Mayor and Councillors are to retain any semblance of propriety in the pursuit of justice, they must:

  • move to have the Henry Report received and tabled,

  • move that it be made public and circulated to Councillors and the media,

  • move that an Independent delegate of the CEO prepare an Executive summary.

  • move that it be referred to the Department of Local Government for their perusal and advice,

  • determine whether the Henry Report’s evidence is flawed due to the fact that the evidence was not taken under Oath.

The Cairns and the greater region, will be keenly interested in the outcome of this matter. If Councillors and staff are to fall on their swords, then so be it. The residents are after firm leadership and governance without fear or favour.

The ball is firmly in the court of the Mayor and the Councillors of the Cairns Regional Council. Not the CEO.

Sunday, 31 May 2009

Nitschke thanks JCU Cairns students

The offer from the James Cook University Student Association to host the euthanasia public meeting and workshop in Cairns, was welcomed today by Exit Director, Dr Philip Nitschke, following a story in CairnsBlog on Saturday.

Speaking from Townsville, Dr Nitschke of Exit International, he relieved that there had been an alternative venue made available after the last minute decision by Cairns City Council to cancel the planned event at the Cairns City Library.

"The late decision by the Cairns Regional Council library, had threatened the event and would have been a blow to free speech and the need for open debate on this important issue, Dr Nitschke said. "Exit was grateful for the offer of an alternative venue by Janine Aitken, Education Officer of the Student Association."

Dr Nitschke said the incident was similar to the events that had taken place in Mackay where there had been a last minute decision to cancel the venue that had been booked. In this case it was the Central Queensland University Mackay campus who had come forward with an alternative venue.

“Once again we have the important issue of free speech and open debate on contentious issues being threatened by decisions to close venues - it is now thanks to the James Cook University Student Association that this issue will receive the open debate it deserves. We particularly welcome the interest shown by the younger generation in the euthanasia debate.

Dr Nitschke said the public meeting would now start at 11.30am Monday morning, in the refectory of the James Cook University, Smithfield campus..

“I will put the proposition that is makes sense for elderly and sick Australians to develop a practical strategy so they can reliably end their lives at the time of their choosing. Those who agree with me will be invited to a closed session to discuss the practicalities of such a plan that will follow on from the public meeting,” Dr Nitschke said.

Watch out when you hear a beep

Missed this one, by a few days, and us Bloggers should take note ;-)

Queensland parliament adopted phone tapping laws laws under the Telecommunications Interception Act 2009.

This will allow Police and the Crime and Misconduct Commission to apply for telecommunications interception warrants.

"The passing of this legislation ensures Queensland authorities have access to the tools they need to fight crime and keep Queenslanders safe," Attorney-General Cameron Dick says.

"These powers assist officers investigating serious crimes such as drug trafficking, paedophilia, organised crime, serious premeditated violent crimes, and corruption."

However, Australian Council for Civil Liberties president Terry O'Gorman, says new laws can be abused, if more resources aren't provided for the Public Interest Monitor, a new statutory appointment under the Act.

I support such tools being provided to catch nutters, however get rather concerned when the State becomes too much of a big brother.

Wonder if they should be looking into tapping a few Cairns Regional Councillors Blackberrys?

Wild Rivers heritage legislation, leads to conflict

ALP's Wild Rivers divisive legislation to turn Cape York's waterways into World Heritage, is leading to conflict.

Last Monday, well-known Greens leader in Cairns Denis Walls, wrote to CairnsBlog with a request.

Denis apparently feels that I have been publishing misinformation about Wild Rivers and Cape York Peninsula [here is the follow-up story.] He asked me to put up an article by Greg Roberts from The Australian, which alleged strong disagreement between Cape York leader Noel Pearson, and his brother Gerhardt Pearson.

Denis described the article as “revealing”.

I don’t know enough about Cape York and the issues involved, so I sent the material to CairnsBlog correspondent Bryan Law for his perspective, as he has a history and background of involvement with Indigenous Australians in Cape York.

Bryan said the story was a beat-up by The Australian. He also said the comments from Gerhardt Pearson in his letter to Anna Bligh (to publicly commit to progressing the nomination of Cape York for World Heritage listing, and that she should "work collaboratively with traditional owners, landholders and green groups"), have been said by many Aboriginal leaders, including Noel Pearson, for a long time.

According to Bryan, “Noel Pearson has long supported the World Heritage listing of Cape York Peninsula after due process. It was an integral part of the Cape York Heads of Agreement signed by Noel and others in 1996, but there it was placed in a context of Aboriginal land ownership that had to be respected through an agreed process of consultation and negotiation.”

Article 13 has a reference to World Heritage listing:
  • 13. The parties agree that areas of high conservation and cultural value shall be identified by a regional assessment process according to objective national and international criteria.

    There shall be an independent review acceptable to all parties in the case of dispute as to whether the values are consistent with the criteria. Where such areas are identified, the landholder shall enter into appropriate agreements to protect the area under State or Commonwealth provision which may include World Heritage listing.

    As part of such agreements, funds shall be provided for management of the area, monitoring of agreements and equitable economic and social adjustment.
“Noel’s problem now is that the consultation process has not been carried out effectively, or in good faith,” Bryan Law says.

Bryan Law suggested that instead of simply reprinting The Australian’s article, CairnsBlog ask Denis Walls of The Greens for his own thinking on the issues involved, starting with the principles of negotiation and informed consent that are embedded in the Heads of Agreement.
CAFNEC’s new coordinator, Sarah Hoyle, was reported in the Cairns Post on 22 May:-
  • “CAFNEC supported a World Heritage nomination process for Cape York Peninsula that was underpinned by the free, prior and informed consent and agreement of traditional owners, and other land holding interests”.

Does Denis Walls agree with Sarah’s statement? “Yes,” says Denis. He is emphatic that World Heritage nomination should not take place without Traditional Owner (TO) consent. However, he denies that consultation to date has been ineffective, and asserts that right now will be “the start of what will probably be a 10-year process with massive TO input to come”.

Denis goes on to complain about Noel Pearson, and the level of support he receives from the Australian.

"Noel is one prominent leader amongst a diverse population. Many TOs are probably happy with the Bligh government, The Wilderness Society, and the Greens. They are a diverse mob," Denis Walls says.

In addition, Denis accuses the Australian of “being gung ho behind Noel Pearson for some time. The Weekend Australian was one constant attack on green groups. Today’s piece redressed the balance a bit for the first time”.

"The Greens had a good relationship with Balkunu and Cape York Land Council," Denis Walls says. "They had a good meeting only 18 months ago, before the last federal election."

I can’t help but feel things may have changed a little since then.

One problem The Greens will have is the unrestrained behavior of The Wilderness Society, which continues to issue provocative comments about Cape York from their protected bunkers in Sydney and Canberra.

There seems to be precisely one publicly identified development proposal (near Lockhart River on Cape York Peninsula), that may fall foul of the Wild Rivers and World Heritage legislation. The proposal involves some 16,000 hectares of Pongamia pinnata, an Asian tree, in plantations for the production of bio-diesel.

The proponent, Evergreen Fuels, claims that 35 of 37 TO trustees support the development. One TO says the proposal keeps changing and is filled with uncertainty. Bryan Law says the proposal is the kind of issue that cries out to be resolved through negotiation and problem-solving engaged in with good faith.

“Employment issues, the local economy, and the provision of sustainable fuels at Lockhart River are all issues that green groups should be interested in supporting," Bryan Law says.

"TOs ought drive the issue, and green groups seek input respectfully. If collectively we can’t problem-solve around a proposal like this, and at the same time we are unable to bring bauxite mining under control, then I think Noel Pearson is right – the legislation will effectively discriminate against Aboriginal people”.

It all appears to be much simpler for Cape York activist Lyndon Schneiders, has long campaigned for protection who said from his bunker in Sydney that rainforest, woodlands, and native grasslands would be bulldozed under the plan.

“It is not worthless cattle country as is implied by the proponents. Importing a weed into an area of high conservation value with marginal economic prospects looks like an ecological disaster,” Lyndon Schneiders says.

So not only is Cape York Peninsula a wilderness area where native people get in the way, “non-native” plants are “weeds”. Lyndon lives in a town where no high conservation values exist anymore, and where non-native weeds like wheat provide his daily bread – and he compensates for this by telling the poorest, weakest and most isolated Australians, what they are allowed to do on their own land.

I wonder whether or not the colonial mentality is alive and well in some parts of the Green movement – and whether or not younger leaders like Sarah Hoyle, are able to restore some integrity to what used to be called the Green/Black alliance.

Time will tell.