tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7878592054777492431.post5661140381742769326..comments2024-01-20T10:32:53.309+10:00Comments on CairnsBlog.net: Rudd rat-fucks GillardMichael P Moorehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02890121680113642715noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7878592054777492431.post-89246628230395234252010-08-04T20:24:27.165+10:002010-08-04T20:24:27.165+10:00If politicians employed the 3 Rules they would not...If politicians employed the 3 Rules they would not have to look over their backs or worry about leaks.<br /><br />3 Rules ??: honesty, integrity, transparency. <br /><br />In fact, it's not only pollies, but if we could all attempt to live our lives in a similar manner, how much easier & simpler our world could be.Lillian at Yorkeysnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7878592054777492431.post-68554228018218019362010-08-04T00:35:26.923+10:002010-08-04T00:35:26.923+10:00Syd, these are obvious political tactics to try an...Syd, these are obvious political tactics to try and counter Gillard's popularity with women. Research has consistently shown that Tony Abbott was actively disliked by women for his anti-gay stand, anti-abortion views and his delaying of the cervical cancer vaccines to teenage girls when he was Minister (John Howard had to personally intervene). In a Womens Weekly magazine interview last year, Abbott also admitted he had told his daughters that their most precious asset was their virginity.<br /><br />All of these out-dated views point to Abbott being some kind of speedo wearing mad Mullah.<br />Then again, we remember other politicians who claimed to be "Christians" with "good moral values" who were subsequently revealed as disgusting paedophiles.<br /><br />I suspect the "leaks" are nothing but sheer political skulduggery to manipulate the womens vote.Alison Allowaynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7878592054777492431.post-69530456704906501892010-08-03T23:43:28.061+10:002010-08-03T23:43:28.061+10:00This Kiwiblog analysis is rather like Laurie Oakes...This Kiwiblog analysis is rather like Laurie Oakes spin recyled.<br /><br />A few points it doesn't mention:<br /><br />(1) Some of the leaks have been 'anti-Rudd'. (2) Even private conversations betwen known participants can be bugged. (3) It is possible that NO-ONE in the ALP leadership is responsible for the leaks, which are of zero benefit to any of them. There are other possibilities. (4) Do the handful of journalists who mysteriously get these marvellous leaks themselves have an agenda by any chance? Are they serving anyone else's agenda?<br /><br />The story of these 'leaks' may be as Laurie Oakes and Chris Uhlmann hint. Or it may be quite different. <br /><br />What's clear is that it has wasted at least a week of the nation's time, while we all debate utter trivia selected and served up to us by a handful of unelected, unnaccountable protagonists.Syd Walkerhttp://sydwalker.info/blog/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7878592054777492431.post-74553002270319710272010-08-03T12:55:02.586+10:002010-08-03T12:55:02.586+10:00Now you know why Rudd had to go.
Latham always sai...Now you know why Rudd had to go.<br />Latham always said Rudd used to ingratiate himself with the media by telling spiteful tales out of school. That one about Julia opposing pension increases sounds just typical of a porkie.nocturnal congressnoreply@blogger.com